For decades, legal conflicts involving college athletes focused on injury, eligibility, or civil rights. But in the post-NIL era, new kinds of lawsuits are emerging. The lawsuits are showcasing the competing pressures involved when trying to enforce NIL agreements.
Two cases arising this year exemplify the legal issues implicated by this trend. In one case, Duke University sued quarterback Darian Mensah in state court after he announced his intention to transfer to the University of Miami while still under a two-year $8 million NIL deal with Duke. Duke argued the contract gave it exclusive rights to Mensah’s NIL and that transferring would breach that agreement. Mensah obtained a temporary restraining order allowing him to enter the transfer portal. Ultimately, the parties settled before a full hearing, clearing the way for Mensah to transfer to Miami.
In another case, according to multiple reports, the University of Washington was prepared to pursue legal action to enforce Demond Williams Jr.’s NIL contract, which exceeded $4 million. Williams entered the transfer portal but reversed course just two days later. Williams later acknowledged publicly that his brief departure resulted from “really bad advice,” and coach Jedd Fisch described the matter as being in “limbo for 48 hours.”
These cases expose fundamental tensions in modern college sports. NIL agreements increasingly resemble professional contracts, with exclusivity provisions, performance benchmarks, and multi-year terms. The lawsuits also necessitate a reassessment of the legal boundaries within college athletics: student-athletes retain rights to transfer, enroll, and compete wherever they choose under NCAA rules, but are entering into extensive contracts that limit their ability to transfer freely, much like a non-compete agreement.
As NIL deals grow in complexity and transfer markets become more active, these disputes will likely become more common — testing contract law, athlete rights, and the structure of college athletics itself. For student-athletes, families, and institutions alike, consulting with attorneys who have specific experience in NIL law before signing or enforcing these agreements is not only increasingly essential when evaluating the immediate terms of NIL agreements, but fundamental to understanding the legal boundaries that govern modern college athletics.
The legal landscape is evolving rapidly, and guidance from professionals who understand both the contractual and regulatory dimensions of NIL can help all parties avoid costly disputes and make informed decisions. Munck Wilson Mandala LLP is one of the nation’s only law firms with a dedicated NIL and sports law practice. Whether you are a student-athlete vetting a NIL deal, a brand, university, or collective seeking to comply with rapidly changing laws, or you are in the midst of an NIL dispute, Munck Wilson Mandala is prepared to handle your legal needs.
Follow WeAreNIL to stay up to date on the latest sports news.